Hillary

[DrLeftover]

Call Off the Dogs
Maureen Dowd

14 Feb

WASHINGTON — I’LL pay for this column.

The Rottweilers will be unleashed.

Once the Clintons had a War Room. Now they have a Slime Room.

Once they had the sly James Carville, fondly known as “serpenthead.” Now they have the slippery David Brock, accurately known as a snake.

More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.htmlWASHINGTON — I’LL pay for this column.

 

[DrLeftover]

You will, of course note, that this is NOT from those disgusting haters at "fox"....

19 Feb 2015
The Clintons have relied heavily on their close ties to Wall Street, with donations from the financial services sector representing the largest share of corporate donors.

And many of the foundation’s biggest donors are foreigners who are legally barred from giving to U.S. political candidates. A third of foundation donors who have given more than $1 million are foreign governments or other entities based outside the United States, and foreign donors make up more than half of those who have given more than $5 million.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-raised-nearly-2-billion-for-foundation-since-2001/2015/02/18/b8425d88-a7cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html?

 

[+paradox]

ah please no more clinton, can't she go away or something...    

yeah, i'm bad...  

 

[DrLeftover]

She won't go away, but the Internet might.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signaled support for the Federal Communications Commission upcoming vote to make the internet a Title II public utility.

When asked directly by Re/Code’s Kara Swisher if she supported the FCC’s upcoming vote, she said she supported President Obama’s position on the issue.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/02/25/hillary-clinton-endorses-fccs-title-ii-designation-for-the-internet/

 

[DrLeftover]

Reports: MSM Reporters Give Hillary Clinton Standing Ovation after She Takes No Questions, Jokes about Email Scandal

24 March

On Monday evening, mainstream media reporters reportedly gave Hillary Clinton a standing ovation after she joked about her private email scandal and took no questions from the press–at an event honoring excellence in journalism.

According to a National Journal report, Clinton took no questions after her 20-minute speech in Washington, D.C., which prompted the Washington Post‘s Dan Balz, who won this year’s Robin Toner award for excellence in political reporting, to reportedly make Clinton an offer: “I am happy to yield my time back to you if you want to take some questions.” Time reported that “Clinton received a standing ovation” anyway “from the journalist-heavy crowd.”

In her speech, Clinton reportedly cracked jokes about her email scandal, saying she was “all about new beginnings. A new grandchild. A new hairstyle. A new email account. A new relationship with the press. No more secrecy, no more zone of privacy… After all what good did that do for me?”

“Before I go any further, if you look under your chairs, you’ll find a simple non-disclosure agreement. My attorneys drew it up,” she reportedly quipped.

After claiming her “relationship with the press has been at times, shall we say, complicated,” Clinton, according to CBS News, “challenged the journalists in the room to be thorough and measured.

“We need more than ever smart, fair-minded journalists to challenge our assumptions, push us towards new solutions, and hold all of us accountable,” she reportedly told mainstream media reporters who notoriously protect Democrats like Clinton.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/24/reports-msm-reporters-give-hillary-standing-ovation-after-she-takes-no-questions-jokes-about-email-scandal/

 

[DrLeftover]

Hillary Clinton Makes It Hard to Follow the Money
Her family's foundation collects millions from foreign donors. As secretary of state, she benefited from pricey intelligence reports, but it's unknown who footed the bill. To whom is she beholden?

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ton-makes-it-hard-to-follow-the-money/388988/

You will, of course, note, that this is NOT from those disgusting haters at Fox

 

[Webster]

 

[DrLeftover]

4/5/15

Gary Hart has serious reservations about a Hillary Clinton candidacy.
....
Hart, a two-time Democratic presidential candidate, offered his opinions in a phone interview Wednesday where he also expressed admiration of Elizabeth Warren and gave advice to prospective challenger Martin O’Malley, a former Hart campaign staffer.

“I like Hillary Clinton. I really appreciate what she and her husband have done … but we need new leaders,” said Hart,

... ...
“I’m now told the Clinton campaign intends to raise $1 billion. Now, that ought to frighten every American,” he said.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...nton-2016-billion-dollar-campaign-116673.html

 

[DrLeftover]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ready-hillary-fire-sale-50-champagne-glasses_911074.html

 

[DrLeftover]

"In all three of these states, more, and in Colorado many more, registered voters say she is not honest and trustworthy,"

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-...ing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2184

 

[DrLeftover]

http://nypost.com/2015/04/11/oh-hill-no-clintons-presidential-plan-is-growing-stale/

 

[Webster]

...well, the world's worst-kept open secret will be revealed at long last:

(Bloomberg News) Hillary Clinton will make her long-anticipated second run for the presidency official Sunday afternoon.

A source with knowledge of the campaign's plans confirmed the timing to Bloomberg. The announcement, which will be on a video delivered via social media, comes one day after the Clinton campaign team gathered Saturday in Brooklyn for a prelaunch pep-talk from campaign manager Robby Mook. He discussed the “purpose and values” that will define the operation, which will be known as Hillary for America.

In a memo shared with attendees—who are technically volunteers until the campaign formally launches—Mook describes the “purpose,” “goal,” and “guiding principles” of Clinton's imminent campaign, in terms that stand in stark relief to how Clinton's 2008 run panned out.

The campaign’s purpose is “to give every family, every small business, and every American a path to lasting prosperity,” according to the document, which was obtained by Bloomberg following an initial report by Politico. (The full text of the memo is included below.)

Clinton’s 2008 campaign became a battle of egos from the candidate on down, a reality that ultimately undermined her message of trying to improve Americans’ lives and the country's standing around the world. But this time, the memo says, the “campaign is not about Hillary Clinton and not about us—it’s about the everyday Americans who are trying to build a better life for themselves and their families.”

The message was Mook’s idea, according a Democratic operative who was at the meeting. It includes input from a wide range of Clinton advisers, including top strategist Nebulousl Benenson, ad-man Roy Spence, and longtime aide Huma Abedin.

The one-page document also includes eight “guiding principles” that stress teamwork, diversity, discipline, and “the importance of having fun.”

We are a team: we are committed to helping each other succeed to deliver on our core purpose,” the memo says, hinting at a key 2008 weakness.

It continues: We are a diverse, talented family: we work together, empower and respect each other, and have each other’s backs, especially our volunteers.

Mook drew on many of the values that have been most important in the winning campaigns that he has led, including being disciplined and “driven every day by strategy, not tactics or one offs.”

“We know there will be tough days, but we will bounce back and get back to work,” the memo continues. “We take risks, always measuring with empirical data to establish best practices.”

Finally, “we are guided by Hillary’s bedrock values of hard work, service, fairness, and faith in the American Dream.”

 

[mrldii]

Not a word? She tweeted it 3 hours ago.

"3 hours ago
I'm running for president. Everyday Americans need a champion, and I want to be that champion. –H https://www.hillaryclinton.com"

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton

 

[DrLeftover]

damned reply buttons......

Not a word? She tweeted it 3 hours ago.

"Three Hours?"

She's been raising money and gathering support AGAIN for six years.

 

[mrldii]

damned reply buttons......



"Three Hours?"

She's been raising money and gathering support AGAIN for six years.

Nahhhh...factually-speaking, she announced her run just 3 hours ago. Prior to that, it was all speculation.



I assumed the reason no one had even mentioned it, is they were all recovering from the massive heart-attacks/strokes they'd suffered upon hearing the news


and electronic devices aren't allowed in ICUs.

 

[DrLeftover]

Question.

She's Hillary Clinton now?

When did she drop the Rodham part?

 

[mrldii]

Question.

She's Hillary Clinton now?

When did she drop the Rodham part?

I'm sure it was a marketing decision, based either on the fact that 3 names is too much for the average voter to remember and/or that since only 'feminazis' - and 'sissified men' - keep their name when adding their married name to the equation,

3 names would be too much for our patriarchal society to bear, and it might come tumbling down upon itself. Baby steps...baby steps,


yanno?

 

[Webster]

As if we didn't need a reminder, the New York Post has an article detailing some of the pitfalls in front of HRC: the controversy surrounding the Clinton Foundation, her spotty resume as Senator and then, Sec. of State, her shady financial dealings, the Clinton Family's greed, reminders of Bill's past affairs, that secret e-mail server....

 

[mrldii]

Ahhhh, give the media time; it's early in the process and not all of the 12+ Republican contenders have stepped up, yet.

Not to worry...there'll be plenty of real/imaginary/factual/diversionary items posted about Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mario Rubio, and Jeb Bush, too. That's how the Washington Game is played...and, We, The People, wouldn't have it any other way!!!

 

[WHO IS SERAFIN]

So the old hag who should be in jail actually announced she is running. I really didn't think it would happen. Can't wait for debate to show what actually is not the intelligent woman the left thinks she is.