What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

How Would Republicans Run The House If Given the Majority in 2023?

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
25,800
OT Bucks
70,878
(The Guardian) While taking the Senate is a steeper hill to climb, Republicans have a much better shot of winning a majority in the House of Representatives, where they would have the power to launch impeachment proceedings.

The bigger question is: who would they impeach? And what for?

While some Democrats believe they’ll go straight for Biden himself, CNN reports that a campaign has emerged to impeach homeland security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, whom the GOP complains is at fault for not stopping the flow of migrants and asylum seekers across the southern border with Mexico. Indeed, Republican lawmakers have been campaigning on the border issue in the upcoming midterms, and impeaching Mayorkas could give them the ability to say they’ve made good on that promise, though launching the procedure against a cabinet secretary has only been done once before in American history.

However, the strategy is not without risks, and it’s unclear if enough Republican House lawmakers would back it, or if their leader Kevin McCarthy is on board. Here’s what CNN has to say: GOP Rep. Steve Womack of Arkansas said Republicans “should focus on policy” and “leave some of the other more emotional topics for another day.”

“The risk is if people lose faith in the ability of Congress to even do its basic function,” Womack said of voter blowback for impeaching Mayorkas. “The people that I talk to from all stripes tell me they want a Congress that works – not a Congress that is preoccupied with kind of revenge-type agendas. Because then a lot of other things (that) need to happen don’t get to happen. And then that hurts the country.”

So far, McCarthy has carefully sidestepped impeachment questions, insisting Republicans are not going to pre-determine the outcome but are willing to go wherever the facts and the law lead them. Yet McCarthy has not shut the door on the idea either, particularly when it comes to Mayorkas. And when pressed by CNN on whether Mayorkas is vulnerable to impeachment in a GOP-led House, he replied: “What happens at the border is above everything else.”
 
I'm terrified of a republican majority again, given their current focuses, and then what's going to happen in the next Presidential election...eek...
 
I'm terrified of a republican majority again, given their current focuses, and then what's going to happen in the next Presidential election...eek...

Me too! However, hopefully the can make the gas prices and grocery prices go down if they do take over. :lol:
 
Bitter aftertaste...
Especially when you think about some of the GOP's shining stars...
-Marjorie Taylor Greene
-Lauren Boebert
-Andy Biggs
-Thomas Massie
-Paul Gosar
...etc., etc., etc.

I'd rather live at the Mos Eisley Cantina....
 
(The Guardian) What would Republicans do with a majority in the House? Demand concessions in exchange for raising the debt limit, which will likely be necessary at some point next year, Politico reports.

GOP lawmakers could demand that the tax cuts passed during the Trump administration are made permanent, or that Social Security and Medicare, the two massive federal benefit programs for older Americans that have long been in Republicans’ crosshairs, are overhauled. But the strategy is a risky one, because without an agreement to lift its legal ability to borrow, Washington could default on its debt – with potentially calamitous implications for the global economy. And even if Republicans took both the House and the Senate, expect tortuous negotiations with Biden to find an agreement.

Here’s more from Politico: Tight Senate margins and a Democratic president would make it impossible for GOP leaders to deliver on the party’s most hardline fiscal wishes, at least with President Joe Biden still in office. The disappointment would surely prompt blowback from right-leaning Republicans already known as the sharpest thorns in the party’s side.

“Spare me if you’re a Republican who puts on your frigging campaign website, ‘Trust me, I will vote for a balanced budget amendment, and I believe we should balance the budget like every family in America.’ No shit,” Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), a member of the pro-Trump Freedom Caucus, said in an interview. “You have two simple leverage points: when government funding comes up and when the debt ceiling is debated,” Roy reminded his fellow Republicans. “And the only question that matters is, will leadership use that leverage?”
 
I'm terrified of a republican majority again, given their current focuses, and then what's going to happen in the next Presidential election...eek...

We need a president that's actually going to make good change. Both Trump and Biden are shitty presidents.
 
I completely agree, but who is that going to be?

I have no clue. The voting system in America sucks. I know Trump doesn't have a snow balls chance in hell. I will not vote for Biden. But what I will do is vote for his opponent. Anyone has to be better than Biden, who is so full of dementia and bad decisions. It surprises me that they've let him stay in office. The biggest mistake he made was putting more strict regulations on oil and signing all of these anti oil deals with France. This has put strain on supply chains via transportation causing prices to steadily increase. He's costing everyone a fuck ton of money and he needed to go yesterday.

Meanwhile, Biden has done a lot to discourage a resurgence in U.S. drilling and production. He has cancelled pipelines, threatened oil and gas producers with higher taxes, taken promising acreage out of play, such as the Arctic Natural Wildlife Refuge, slow-walked leasing and new drilling permits and, most recently, imposed new methane-curbing rules that make drilling more expensive.
 
I agree he needs to go, but I'm cautious about who should replace him.
Be careful what you wish for, given that a couple sharks named Trump and DeSantis are out there....
 
It has happened in 1994, again in 2010, let's hope this won't be the case in 2022.
 
Back
Top Bottom