What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Human Ancestors Made Stone Tools Earlier Than Previously Thought

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
25,552
OT Bucks
69,522
Reuters: Human Ancestors Made Stone Tools Earlier Than Previously Known

r

A stone tool discovered in desert badlands near Lake Turkana in northwestern Kenya, is pictured in this undated handout photo provided by MPK-WTAP.
Our ancient ancestors made stone tools, a milestone achievement along the path of human progress, much earlier than previously thought and far before the appearance of the first known member of our genus Homo.

Scientists on Wednesday announced the discovery of 3.3-million-year-old stone tools in desert badlands near Lake Turkana in northwestern Kenya, including sharp-edged flakes that could have been used for cutting meat from animal carcasses and rudimentary hammers perhaps used to pound open nuts or tubers.

They are 700,000 years older than any other such stone tools ever found and predate by 500,000 years the earliest-known fossils of the genus Homo, meaning they likely were fashioned by a more primitive species on the human family tree.

"The transition from only using natural organic tools, like chimps do, to intentionally creating a specific tool from stone represents an advance in cognitive ability in our ancestors," said archaeologist Sonia Harmand of the Turkana Basin Institute at Stony Brook University in New York.

Our species, Homo sapiens, appeared roughly 200,000 years ago. The earliest-known members of the genus Homo date to 2.8 million years ago. A variety of more ape-like human ancestors preceded them.

It had long been presumed that stone tool-making was a hallmark of our genus. This discovery suggests it was the more ancient human ancestors who made the cognitive leap needed for crafting such implements.

Turkana Basin Institute paleoanthropologist Jason Lewis said it remains unclear who made the tools. He listed three possibilities: Kenyanthropus platyops and Australopithecus afarensis, species that combine ape-like and human-like traits; or an as-yet undiscovered early member of Homo.

Fossils of Kenyanthropus platyops, known for its flat face, have been found near the tool site. Australopithecus afarensis is the species that includes the famous "Lucy" fossil found in Ethiopia in 1974.

Geologist Chris Lepre of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, who determined the tools' age, said the discovery suggests such implements came into use before the evolution of large brains in the human lineage.

The tools, made from volcanic rock, include sharp-edged flakes of various sizes, the rocks from which these flakes were struck, larger rectangular blocks that served as anvils and smaller, harder stones that served as hammers.

They were made in a process called knapping, breaking off pieces with hard strikes from another stone; 149 stone artifacts were detailed in the research published in the journal Nature, with more still being recovered.

Thoughts?
 
looks like a rock
*deadpans* Well, they didn't have power tools back then, Mike...unless you count one's armstrength as a power tool...
 
wut?...according to some christians the planet is less than 4 thousand years old....can you explain that one?

oh wait, yeah....its cos they are morons
 
wut?...according to some christians the planet is less than 4 thousand years old....can you explain that one?

oh wait, yeah....its cos they are morons

You misquoted the age of the Earth according to the pious old gentleman by 2000 years. He worked it out to 4004 BC based on the chronologies in the Old Testament. Later the estimate was 'improved' to 0900 hours, 3 October, 4004 BC by others.

You do realize that Bishop Ussher's calculations have been dismissed as little more than clever math and wishful thinking by most serious religious scholars for a very long time now.

There are a few that still believe it, I believe the Westboro Baptist Church would consider the calculations accurate, and perhaps a few scattered Amish groups, but that might be about it, besides yourself of course.
 
Found this article over on Reddit that might shed some light on the growing controversy over the article mentioned in the OP...quoting:
(Reddit) In light of the recent article in Nature regarding the 3.3 Million year old stone tools found in Africa and the very long comment thread in this subreddit, a discussion of archaeological methods seems timely.
African Fossils.org has put together a really nice site which has movable 3D photos of the artifacts.

Some of the most common questions in the comment thread included;
--"Those look like rocks!"
--"How can we tell they are actually tools?"
--"How can they tell how old the tools are?"

Distinguishing Artifacts from Ecofacts
Some of the work co-authors and I have done was cited in the Nature paper. Building on previous work we were looking at methods to distinguish human-manufactured stone tools (artifacts) from natural rocks (called ecofacts). This is especially important at sites where the lithic technology is rudimentary, as in the Kenyan example cited above or several potentially pre-Clovis sites in North America.

Our technique was to use several attributes of the tools which are considered to appear more commonly on artifacts rather than ecofacts because they signify intentionality rather than accidental creation.

These included:
--flakes of a similar size
--flakes oriented and overlapping forming an edge
--bulbs of percussion indicating strong short term force rather than long term pressure
--platform preparation
--small flakes along the edge showing a flintknapper preparing and edge;
--stone type selection
--use wear on edges, among others

We tested known artifact samples, known ecofact samples and the test sample and compared the frequency of these attributes to determine if the test samples were more similar to artifacts or ecofacts. This method provides a robust way to differentiate stone tools from naturally occurring rocks.

Other Points for Discussion
The press received by the Nature article provides a unique teaching opportunity for archaeologists to discuss their methods with each other and to help laypeople better understand how we learn about prehistory.

Other topics derived from the Nature article could include;
  • dating methods
  • excavation methods
  • geoarchaeology
  • interpretive theory
(Reddit user THHUXLEY)
 
This article comes as no surprise to me whatsoever. It's my belief, Catholicism aside, that humans existed at the onset of the existence of the earth and most certainly even before. The only thing that surprises me is that we choose to have no clue regarding what we have no clue about lol
 
Early human history appears to be more complicated as well.

'New species' of ancient human found
28 May
A new species of ancient human has been unearthed in the Afar region of Ethiopia, scientists report.

Researchers discovered jaw bones and teeth, which date to between 3.3m and 3.5m years old.

It means this new hominin was alive at the same time as several other early human species, suggesting our family tree is more complicated than was thought.

The study is published in the journal Nature.

The new species has been called Australopithecus deyiremeda, which means "close relative" in the language spoken by the Afar people.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-32906836
 
Back
Top Bottom