What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

Obama: Supreme Court Should Not Have Accepted Obamacare Challenge

Webster

Retired Snark Master
Administrator
Joined
May 11, 2013
Posts
25,369
OT Bucks
68,564
....since when did he get to decide what the High Court hears?
(Huffington Post) On Monday, President Barack Obama said the Supreme Court should not have taken up the challenge to the Affordable Care Act in King v. Burwell.

"This should be an easy case. Frankly, it probably should not even have been taken up," Obama said during a press conference at the G-7 summit in Germany.

When asked whether the administration had a "plan B," in the event that the Supreme Court strikes down subsidies in states that do not run their own health insurance exchanges, Obama said there are no easy solutions.

"You have a model where all the pieces connect," he said. "And there are a whole bunch of scenarios -- not just with relation to health care but all kinds of stuff I do -- where if somebody does something that does not make any sense, it is hard to fix. This would be hard to fix."

The president called the legal challenge “bizarre” in light of the law’s successful implementation.

“What’s more the thing’s working,” Obama said. “Part of what is bizarre about the whole thing is that we have not had a lot of conversation about the horrors of Obamacare because none of them have come to pass.”

The Supreme Court will announce a ruling this month on whether the Affordable Care Act's designation of an "exchange established by the state" means that the law can only provide subsidies to individuals in states that run their own exchanges. If the court rules in favor of a narrow interpretation of that provision of the law, 6.4 million people in 34 states will lose their subsidies, leaving many unable to afford insurance.

Thoughts?
 
My thought is we have had bad presidents before but we have never had this level of incompetence followed by childish threats he likes to throw at equal branches of government he disagrees with. But I still think Obama has something on one of those people in the supreme court and that is why the ruling was changed at the last minute for obama care. And I hope I am wrong but I think he was sending that message out once again to the supreme court just like he did before the ruling came out before Obama care.
 
My thought is we have had bad presidents before but we have never had this level of incompetence followed by childish threats he likes to throw at equal branches of government he disagrees with. But I still think Obama has something on one of those people in the supreme court and that is why the ruling was changed at the last minute for obama care. And I hope I am wrong but I think he was sending that message out once again to the supreme court just like he did before the ruling came out before Obama care.
...and to think, I supported the sonuvabitch....oy. :shock::shock::shock::scared2:
 
Back
Top Bottom