What's new

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

🎁

Member Interviews

Feel free to start a thread here! We'd love to ask you some questions and get to know you better. Can't wait to chat!

In the News

Share all current news stories here to inspire discussion and comments. Check here for engaging articles that spark curiosity.

Member Introductions

Welcome to Off Topix! We're excited to have you here. Take this opportunity to introduce yourself to our vibrant community and start connecting with others!

Of course: Anti-police protesters call the police after road blockade goes bad

WHO IS SERAFIN

Platinum Member
Valued Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Posts
7,080
Reaction score
611
Points
965
This is to funny. Cop haters asking for help. Let them rot.


The takeaways from this story:

1) Saturday night anti-police protest with bonus American flag burning takes place in Los Angeles.

2) Protesters linked hands and blocked Hollywood Boulevard.

3) Motorist “plowed people down,” though I wouldn’t exactly call this “plowing through” the line of people:

4) Irony overdose ensues: “We’re calling 911 now.”

5) Cop-bashing agitators accused the police of not doing enough to help them (pause for laughter).

For some reason I’m reminded of the old Dennis Miller line: “I’m very insecure — I get depressed when I find out that people I hate don’t like me.”

Moral of the story: Any disobedience of the civil disobedient protesting of intolerance will not be tolerated.
http://michellemalkin.com/2014/12/28/of-course-anti-police-protesters-call-the-police-after-road-blockade-goes-bad/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GDtQ8PylPQQ
 
They just found out the victim was shot in the back and the back had a gun muzzle mark. Can anyone explain this!?
 
Exactly. I would take that as a possible threat to my life if angry people began surrounding my car in the road. And if my wife was in the car even more so.
 
The states are in war against themselves.

Canada, so peaceful.
 
seasidemike said:
Enter Username Here said:
The states are in war against themselves.

Canada, so peaceful.

it is kind of scary watching it

Yeah, it is kind of scary watching how quiet Canada America's 51st & 52nd states are at present... :lol:
 
Nothing EVER happens in Canada.

30 December 2014
Canada Edmonton: Eight killed in 'senseless mass murder'
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30627630

Oh, well, except for that.

Dec 29, 2014
Man shot and killed by transit police in Surrey
Police were responding to reports of a man with a knife inside Safeway store
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/man-shot-and-killed-by-transit-police-in-surrey-1.2884943

you know....

26 Dec
A single shot fired outside an Ottawa mall left one person with minor injuries Friday in what police were treating as an isolated incident.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/canada-mall-shooting-hurts-active-shooter-27844996

And, well, that...

21 Dec

U.S. officers shot a Canadian man who walked toward a border inspection booth waving what they said looked like a handgun early ...
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/21/us/canada-border-shooting/


well....
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
Exactly. I would take that as a possible threat to my life if angry people began surrounding my car in the road. And if my wife was in the car even more so.

actually, the driver broke the law by striking the people that were in that walkway... and only after the driver ran into people illegally may i add, then it was when other people started to go towards the car...

the car driver was in the wrong for striking the people, that should be assault with a deadly weapon, a cop would charge that on anyone if they did the same thing to a cop...

nice try though...  :cool:
 
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
Exactly. I would take that as a possible threat to my life if angry people began surrounding my car in the road. And if my wife was in the car even more so.

actually, the driver broke the law by striking the people that were in that walkway... and only after the driver ran into people illegally may i add, then it was when other people started to go towards the car...

No he was already surrounded by people around his car that were trying to stop the car.. And only after when he felt threatened and tried to go through did more people try to surround the car and stop him. Any normal person would feel like his life is in danger or at least threatened by bodily harm. So I see only a law being broken by the protesters. But it is California land of crazy people so who knows what irrational law they might have. But good job supporting the anarchists.
the car driver was in the wrong for striking the people, that should be assault with a deadly weapon, a cop would charge that on anyone if they did the same thing to a cop...

He could not be more in the right when people are trying to stop a car for motives the driver does not know.

I had actually forgotten about this from years ago but I was preparing a condo for rent and was taking some of the trash to dumpster and happened to be the supervisor for the property and one of his maintenance men were there at the trash compactor. I was bringing up two large bags of trash from my van and this guy the supervisor of the property asks me if I live here? I said no I do not I am preparing the home for the owner. He then tells me I cannot put my trash in the compactor if I do not live here. I tell him I represent the owner and I can and will put the trash in the compactor. And as I go to put in the trash he blocks me from doing it. I then tell him you have a choice you can let me put it in the compactor or I can set right here on the ground and you can still deal with it. So he yells to his guy to call the property manager on the radio. So I say on the ground it is. I drop the bags get in my van and start the video on my phone that hangs on the front windshield. As I am doing that they try to block my way out with there golf carts. My defenses went up and I said I am going through those golf carts one way or another so you better move them. They sensed I meant it and as I back up and revved up the engine the one moved his golf cart as I was heading toward him. About a hour later I get a call from the real estate company that the supervisor is trying to press charges that I tried to run him down. I then found the number to the cop handling the case and eventually talked with him and said I want to press charges for attempted kidnapping and have it on video after explaining my side. He tells me let me talk the supervisor of that property and I will call you back if you need to come in and officially tell your side. Couple hours later the cop calls me back and says when I told him you had the incident recorded he changed his mind on the charges and decided to let it go. Then I said then I do not wish to further my charges of attempted kidnapping.

nice try though...  :cool:

So yes nice try siding with the anarchists.
 
@liberty, you're a nut-case...

in your own video, it starts and the first vehicle is a white one, that car was not surrounded by people, it was moving and going throw people, which is illegal and a felony...

and how are they anarchists? they were protesting and then they got hit by a arshole...

the video is very clear on that...

not much to say now but i'm sure you'll say some wacky loony thing to say that the person in that white car was in danger when the total opposite is the truth... those people that were in the walkway were being struck by the crazy nut using his car to hurt others...

now i guess you support people being run down or struck by cars? :|
 
DrLeftover said:
Nothing EVER happens in Canada.


30 December 2014
Canada Edmonton: Eight killed in 'senseless mass murder'
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30627630

Oh, well, except for that.


Dec 29, 2014
Man shot and killed by transit police in Surrey
Police were responding to reports of a man with a knife inside Safeway store
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/man-shot-and-killed-by-transit-police-in-surrey-1.2884943

you know....


26 Dec
A single shot fired outside an Ottawa mall left one person with minor injuries Friday in what police were treating as an isolated incident.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/canada-mall-shooting-hurts-active-shooter-27844996

And, well, that...


21 Dec

U.S. officers shot a Canadian man who walked toward a border inspection booth waving what they said looked like a handgun early ...
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/21/us/canada-border-shooting/


well....

In Canada....

Never
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
Exactly. I would take that as a possible threat to my life if angry people began surrounding my car in the road. And if my wife was in the car even more so.

actually, the driver broke the law by striking the people that were in that walkway... and only after the driver ran into people illegally may i add, then it was when other people started to go towards the car...


No he was already surrounded by people around his car that were trying to stop the car.. And only after when he felt threatened and tried to go through did more people try to surround the car and stop him. Any normal person would feel like his life is in danger or at least threatened by bodily harm. So I see only a law being broken by the protesters. But it is California land of crazy people so who knows what irrational law they might have. But good job supporting the anarchists.
the car driver was in the wrong for striking the people, that should be assault with a deadly weapon, a cop would charge that on anyone if they did the same thing to a cop...


He could not be more in the right when people are trying to stop a car for motives the driver does not know.

I had actually forgotten about this from years ago but I was preparing a condo for rent and was taking some of the trash to dumpster and happened to be the supervisor for the property and one of his maintenance men were there at the trash compactor. I was bringing up two large bags of trash from my van and this guy the supervisor of the property asks me if I live here? I said no I do not I am preparing the home for the owner. He then tells me I cannot put my trash in the compactor if I do not live here. I tell him I represent the owner and I can and will put the trash in the compactor. And as I go to put in the trash he blocks me from doing it. I then tell him you have a choice you can let me put it in the compactor or I can set right here on the ground and you can still deal with it. So he yells to his guy to call the property manager on the radio. So I say on the ground it is. I drop the bags get in my van and start the video on my phone that hangs on the front windshield. As I am doing that they try to block my way out with there golf carts. My defenses went up and I said I am going through those golf carts one way or another so you better move them. They sensed I meant it and as I back up and revved up the engine the one moved his golf  cart as I was heading toward him. About a hour later I get a call from the real estate company that the supervisor is trying to press charges that I tried to run him down. I then found the number to the cop handling the case and eventually talked with him and said I want to press charges for attempted kidnapping and have it on video after explaining my side. He tells me let me talk the supervisor of that property and I will call you back if you need to come in and officially tell your side. Couple hours later the cop calls me back and says when I told him you had the incident recorded he changed his mind on the charges and decided to let it go. Then I said then I do not wish to further my charges of attempted kidnapping.

nice try though...  :cool:


So yes nice try siding with the anarchists.

And you must be a little child with no self control of there own emotions. Now get those glasses and look at the video again because they were blocking the car and by his window. They were blocking the car. Pause it and zoom it in if that helps but he was being blocked. But keep siding with the law breakers.
 
i'm older than you guy, and my vision is better than perfect...

those protesters were there before that car even came close to them...

others ran towards the car AFTER the car drove passed and struck them...

which is against the law...

it's a felony, it's called assault with a deadly weapon (the car)...

that video would prove with out a shadow of a doubt in a court of law...
 
+Justice said:
i'm older than you guy, and my vision is better than perfect...

those protesters were there before that car even came close to them...

others ran towards the car AFTER the car drove passed and struck them...

which is against the law...

it's a felony, it's called assault with a deadly weapon (the car)...

that video would prove with out a shadow of a doubt in a court of law...

Then for once act like a adult instead of angry little child and KEEP IT ON THE SUBJECT AND NOT THE INDIVIDUAL POSTING!

The protesters were there illegally blocking a road first and would not let him pass. They were blocking him in front and on the sides.

Others ran up after he pushed his way through the anarchists who would not let him pass.

Which the protesters were breaking the law and he or she was defending themselves.

Yes it is a felony for the protesters to try and possibly hijack a car that the owner of the car was feeling might happen or worse.
 
so, you're allowed to call me a loony-toon, a nut-job and what-have-you either directly and/or indirectly, but you get all teary when you get a little taste of your own medicine? yeah, okay, very hypocritical there buddy... ;)
 
+Justice said:
so, you're allowed to call me a loony-toon, a nut-job and what-have-you either directly and/or indirectly, but you get all teary when you get a little taste of your own medicine? yeah, okay, very hypocritical there buddy... ;)

I use those words at the subject being posted. If you want to include that means you directly that is up to you. Just like when you say crazy right wingers or however else you say it I know I am in there but I understand you mean the subject that is being posted. But I never attack you directly in any post unless I get the receiving end of it. Even then I try to just let go but a person can only take so much.
 
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
so, you're allowed to call me a loony-toon, a nut-job and what-have-you either directly and/or indirectly, but you get all teary when you get a little taste of your own medicine? yeah, okay, very hypocritical there buddy... ;)

I use those words at the subject being posted. If you want to include that means you directly that is up to you. Just like when you say crazy right wingers or however else you say it I know I am in there but I understand you mean the subject that is being posted. But I never attack you directly in any post unless I get the receiving end of it. Even then I try to just let go but a person can only take so much.

actually, it's the same thing...

you name call people and group's that have views and what-not that you disagree with so you call them names... just because you don't mention anyone's name doesn't mean you're not attacking/name calling anyone when you know good and well that people here are apart of the people or group that you're calling out...

for instance, you love to group everyone up...

TRUE LIBERTY said:
This is to funny. Cop haters asking for help. Let them rot.

not all "cop haters" are bad people or violent...

not all people that disagree with the today's law enforcement are "cop-haters"...

just because anti-corruption activists dislike the cops for any reason doesn't mean the cops can just not do their jobs...

just because people are outraged against something so legit, doesn't mean that they deserve to rot if they didn't do anything wrong...

if i were a liberal or a democrat and you post something crazy like, 'loony-toon crazy liberal democrat needs to pound salt and rot', then yes, you are talking about a lot of good people including myself, so it would be personal...

but thanks for playing... ;)

on the subject matter...

in the video, there were protesters out in a crosswalk, a car drives up to them and to proceed to run through them, which is against the law and a felony...
 
+freezy said:
TRUE LIBERTY said:
+Justice said:
so, you're allowed to call me a loony-toon, a nut-job and what-have-you either directly and/or indirectly, but you get all teary when you get a little taste of your own medicine? yeah, okay, very hypocritical there buddy... ;)

I use those words at the subject being posted. If you want to include that means you directly that is up to you. Just like when you say crazy right wingers or however else you say it I know I am in there but I understand you mean the subject that is being posted. But I never attack you directly in any post unless I get the receiving end of it. Even then I try to just let go but a person can only take so much.

actually, it's the same thing...

Actually it is not.

you name call people and group's that have views and what-not that you disagree with so you call them names... just because you don't mention anyone's name doesn't mean you're not attacking/name calling anyone when you know good and well that people here are apart of the people or group that you're calling out...

Yes I do on the subject posted. Do it all the time. Now if say Obama joins the forum I would do him the courtesy of calling him by his name for forum respect. Just like I do you the courtesy of not attacking you directly. But I certainly will go after the topic you post I do not agree with. Thats why it is called debate and politics.

for instance, you love to group everyone up...

For simplicity sack yes I do. But again I do it on the subject that is posted not the individuals on the forum.


TRUE LIBERTY said:
This is to funny. Cop haters asking for help. Let them rot.

not all "cop haters" are bad people or violent...

Seems that way to me.

not all people that disagree with the today's law enforcement are "cop-haters"...

Probably not. I disagree with things cops do like most people. But those people in the road are anarchists.

just because anti-corruption activists dislike the cops for any reason doesn't mean the cops can just not do their jobs...

Not sure exactly what you are referring to here.

just because people are outraged against something so legit, doesn't mean that they deserve to rot if they didn't do anything wrong...

But they were breaking the law and blocking traffic and scaring people and that is why people acted the way they did when these crazies were stopping cars

if i were a liberal or a democrat and you post something crazy like, 'loony-toon crazy liberal democrat needs to pound salt and rot', then yes, you are talking about a lot of good people including myself, so it would be personal...

I am only talking about you if I directly use your name.

but thanks for playing... ;)

My pleasure!

on the subject matter...

in the video, there were protesters out in a crosswalk, a car drives up to them and to proceed to run through them, which is against the law and a felony...

There protesters blocking and stopping cars from going through. That is against the law and threatening to drivers.
 
it is against the law to protest by blocking roads and stuff, but there were all over the country and you didn't have someone in a car riding through people... that car knew and seen those people out there protesting and in the street... the driver in the car made it a reason to continue and not turn around... doing so he ran through and struck people that weren't a threat at all as you might want to believe...
 

Create an account or login to post a reply

You must be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Create an account here on Off Topix. It's quick & easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Welcome to Offtopix 👋, Visitor

Off Topix is a well-established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public in 2009! We provide a laid-back atmosphere, and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content, and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register and become a member of our awesome community.

Theme customization system

You can customize some areas of the forum theme from this menu.

  • Theme customizations unavailable!

    Theme customization fields are not available to you, please contact the administrator for more information.

  • Choose the color combination that reflects your taste
    Background images
    Color gradient backgrounds
Back