Jazzy said:
Females DO NOT have penises, and males DO NOT have vaginas.
We all know how babies are born, as a result of female egg and male sperm. Humans are either male or female.
There are more people born missing a body part than are born intersex. And now that we have chromosomal testing even intersex people can be sexed. Most individuals with disorders of sexual development are male= they have a Y chromosome. Chromosomally female intersex have an XO configuration, and are sterile as a result of their chromosomal birth defect. So even the tiny minority of people born with a birth defect of sex can be “sexed”.
What about women who have mastectomies and men who lose a penis in a duck hunting accident- they are still female/male, right?
I was a little confused based on the OP, but aren't we talking about transgenderism in general, not just transexualism? If so, it isn't just biology that comes into place. If that were the case, it would be easy for people with Klinefelter's, for example, to just identify as male. Even after sex therapy, most people with Klinefelter's still struggle with their gender identity. A person's gender identity isn't always fixed to what they were born with. Based on what you just said, doesn't the whole idea of having to 'assign' a sex allude to that?
Khalessi said:
Dee said:
I'm not going to claim to know what it's like as I consider myself a female having been born in a body I'm comfortable with, but there have been studies that suggest while people are born with a certain genitalia and assigned a sex at birth due to social and gender norms, that there is simply more there that meets the eye. There are theories about genetics and brain structure playing a role, and I absolutely believe there is much more that we can learn about ourselves as a human species. We've barely tapped into uncovering explanations even for things we know happen but simply don't know why, so what's different about this?
To say that something isn't real because someone is born with genitalia considered "male/female" by the majority of society is ignorant. Take for example individuals who are intersex. How would they be "categorized"? In my opinion, that a person born with a specific set of genitalia or chromosomal genotype other than XX-female and XY-male nullifies the typical argument that certain genitalia makes it black and white. And in that case the argument that transgenderism is "sick" or "unnatural" is a misguided opinion on the topic.
Who you are is not determined by what's between your legs, which is why I voted for it being a natural thing. Perhaps it doesn't seem natural because we as a society are ignorant to it, and therefore unable to truly understand something or someone different from us can exist and be just as normal.
The most intelligent, and common sense post/reply in this entire thread.
Well expressed Dee.
I agree. That was brilliantly written, Dee.