What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

UK will prosecute ex-pol with dementia with child sex crimes

Jazzy

Wild Thing
Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Posts
79,918
OT Bucks
308,926
British prosecutors have reversed their position and will charge a former lawmaker who now has severe dementia with sex crimes against children.

The Crown Prosecution Service said Monday that a judge and jury would conduct a "trial of the facts" in the case of 86-year-old Greville Janner, although his illness means he will not be convicted or punished.

Police and child abuse victims expressed outrage when prosecutors announced in April that they would not charge Janner over alleged offenses against boys several decades ago, even though there was enough evidence to prosecute. Prosecutors said his Alzheimer's meant he was not fit to stand trial.

But after his alleged victims complained, prosecutors decided "it was in the public interest to bring proceedings before the court."

Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said deciding whether to prosecute had been "an extremely difficult and borderline case because of the strong arguments on both sides."

She said it was "a matter of real regret" that Janner had not been prosecuted sooner.

Janner was a Labour Party lawmaker from 1970-97, later serving in the House of Lords. He is accused of 22 offenses in the 1960s, '70s and '80s, most involving boys in children's homes in Janner's central England constituency.

His family says he is innocent.

The first court hearing in the case has been set for August. The court will decide whether Janner should be excused from attending the trial on medical grounds.

Source

I don't see the point in this. Do you?
 
I don't see the point in this. Do you?
I'm of two minds here...on the one hand, I kinda' agree with you; what's the point of having a trial if no one's going to be punished for anything. OTOH, I look at this in the same way that I look at the ongoing Hillsborough Inquests concerning the 1989 Hillsborough Disaster - by getting the evidence at hand into the official record, it provides a small bit of solace to the victims and their families.
 
Back
Top Bottom