Which is a fools' errand because eventually it does get on you, either by commission or by omission.
Not really, it all depends on the person.. for me personally, I have a tendency to distrust most things.. and people so I am a bit more cautious for that reason.. I leaned in on learning instead of anger from the 2016 election, but I double and triple checked just about everything I read online, and I had this feeling, where if I agree with something a little too much, or it seemed like b.s. then I looked into it.. and 6/10 it was half true.. other times it was false.. and often times it was my love and knowledge of both politics and history, and my instincts that tipped me off..
Other times, I would close my eyes, and recall what I just read, and if I were able to imagine a Klansman saying the same thing, then there was a strong possibility that I had just read something posted be a bot account.. and about 9/10 of them had the U.S. flag and was started on or just after 2015, or just before 2016 election season kicked off.
Other times, I would wonder if these supposedly American accounts, were actually living in this country and paying attention to the news, at the times they were making these claims about Trump.. when that happened, I immediately got the feeling that I was dealing with a bot account..
But I am no stranger to conspiracy theories and I have been debunking them for at least 2 decades.. it is not something I set out to do, but I do it when someone brings it to my attention.. even on social media, which I am not on.. I miss when they were hilariously false, like that stupid 9/11 Wing Dings hoax and the QNY33 bus or whatever it was..
It would seem that these theories have gotten better over the years, and more sophisticated since then. They still follow the same formula and rely more heavily on the laziness of the reader, their ego, how much they fear being wrong and how easily they are to rile up, therefore interfering with logic process and triggering certain emotions.. and always with the "THE LIBRUL MEDIA WONT LET YOU SEE THIS !!!!!111111ONEONE" b.s. or "pass this along to someone who needs to see this.."
A lot of older people are easily susceptible to this for these reasons, and they have an unwillingness to learn about why they were wrong, and just assume that because someone is much younger than they are, that they couldn't possibly know what they are talking about.. but they just know there is no way that they could be wrong themselves, and instead they double down on being wrong because of their ego.
These people don't care about the facts, just their feelings, and this is why I don't care to try to correct or debate them. Feelings aren't facts, and facts aren't feelings.
These people want their opinions validated, and no matter what you say, or how many facts you present as counterpoints, you won't sway them, but the fact that you spent that time trying to do so, only validates their absurdity, and causes others to do the same.. and I am not going to waste my energy on that.