Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
You can't be serious. No they didn't. Judgment Day for Nicholas Cruz came and went. The Jury had their chance to do something respectable for the victims & they fucked it up by not giving him the death penalty.
You can't be serious. No they didn't. Judgment Day for Nicholas Cruz came and went. The Jury had their chance to do something respectable for the victims & they fucked it up by not giving him the death penalty.
You can't be serious. No they didn't. Judgment Day for Nicholas Cruz came and went. The Jury had their chance to do something respectable for the victims & they fucked it up by not giving him the death penalty.
I disagree & I highly doubt that the victims parents would agree with you. Hell, even the prosecutor, Mike Satz stated that the death penalty for this fucktard was appropriate.
I disagree & I highly doubt that the victims parents would agree with you. Hell, even the prosecutor, Mike Satz stated that the death penalty for this fucktard was appropriate.
Doesn't matter what either of them think; once the jury hears the evidence the decision of life or death is theirs under the law and theirs alone.
I don't begrudge the pressure hoisted on them to decide on a man's life but once that decision's made its not to up to backseat drive their decision.
Doesn't matter what either of them think; once the jury hears the evidence the decision of life or death is theirs under the law and theirs alone.
I don't begrudge the pressure hoisted on them to decide on a man's life but once that decision's made its not to up to backseat drive their decision.
No duh. I know how law works. I still don't agree with their decision and no, I don't respect it. You & I are just going to have agree to disagree on the subject. Had Nicholas represented himself without a lawyer, he'd be dead meat.
Doesn't matter what either of them think; once the jury hears the evidence the decision of life or death is theirs under the law and theirs alone.
I don't begrudge the pressure hoisted on them to decide on a man's life but once that decision's made its not to up to backseat drive their decision.
I kind of agree, the jury should not be putting the families feelings in the judgement simply the facts. I was part of putting someone away for 25 years and the lawyer tried to play with our sympathy that he had three kids and the mom didn’t have a job. As hard as it was I cleared that from my mind. Because of me we deadlocked for two days and I eventually got one person to change their minds and it snowballed from there when I said we can be here for a month but I’m going for the full sentencing and nothing you can say will change my mind.
That said I do believe the jury did put their feelings into their decision because there wasn’t a shadow of a doubt he didn’t do it so they didn’t really do their jobs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.