[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Sorry, the fact is that the UN bullied and threatened any scientist who dissented by telling them that they'd either have funding withheld or credientials withdrawn if they didn't sign.
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Yes, it is a shame that the politicization of this issue by skeptics with no credentials whatsoever has lead to some actions being taken to remove deviant opinions. But that doesn't change the data, or the 97% consensus of climate scientists who believe that there is very strong compelling evidence for human-made climate change.
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]And CLIMATE CHANGE has always been a reality. You cannot point to a geologically period of time where the global climate was stable.
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]Well obviously.
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]As to humans having an effect, if we did, why were China and India, with about half of the human population between them, exempt from the treaty, and when Russia said get lost the Global Warmers did.
[font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif]I don't know, but I don't think the reason that human-made climate change is not occurring.