How do you define that, by letting them be themselves and not forcing them to fit into our pre-conceived notions of gender?That respect goes both ways including not hurting children.
Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.
How do you define that, by letting them be themselves and not forcing them to fit into our pre-conceived notions of gender?That respect goes both ways including not hurting children.
They did it with gay & lesbian people for decades and decades (I came out in July 1993, so I know a bit about the old bigotries) and now they're going after trans people. Its' sick and disgusting; worse, I get it from multiple sides because (a) I used to be a conservative and (b) I'm also a practicing Christian (Seventh-Day Adventist, if you must ask).
How do you define that, by letting them be themselves and not forcing them to fit into our pre-conceived notions of gender?
Just don't drive anywhere, that would be bad.Jesus, the wife wants to go out for wine and I think I’m going to have quite a few beers.
Care to change your bullshit comment, sir?Pumping minors still developing is hurting them. It can’t be reversed if they decide being themselves isn’t what they wanted. This desire to not protect children until they are adults is satanic
In January, papers were lodged at the British High Court against the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, which runs the UK’s only gender identity development service (GIDS).
The claimants against the Trust want to establish a legal minimum age of 18 for puberty blocking hormone therapy for young people diagnosed with gender dysphoria, with their lawyers arguing that it is illegal to prescribe the drugs to anyone younger as they cannot give informed consent to the treatment.
The case has been brought about by the parent of a 15-year-old on the GIDS waiting list known as Mrs A, who does not believe children can understand the ramifications of taking puberty blockers. Alongside her is a 23-year-old woman named Keira Bell, who transitioned to male as a teenager but has since detransitioned and believes she should have been challenged more by GIDS during the process.
So-called puberty blockers, known formally as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, are medications that cause the body to stop producing sex hormones. They are delivered either as leuprorelin injections, which are administered by a healthcare worker every three months, or via a histrelin implant, which needs to be replaced annually.
The GnRH antagonists bind to receptors in the pituitary gland, blocking the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) from the anterior pituitary. This leads to suppression of testosterone production in the testes or the suppression of estradiol and progesterone production from the ovaries, depending on the anatomy of the individual taking them.
For young trans people, taking these drugs will prevent things like breast tissue development and periods, or the growth of facial hair and a deepening voice. The effects of drugs are completely reversible, and if a person stops taking them their body will resume sex hormone production as it had done before they started.
As well as being used to suppress puberty in gender-questioning youth, they’re used from the age of six onwards for the management of precocious puberty, when a child’s body enters adolescence too early. GnRH antagonists are also used to treat prostate cancer, as part of IVF fertility treatment and for the management of uterine disorders such as endometriosis or fibroids. They’re even being investigated as a treatment for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia and as a potential contraceptive.
There isn't a desire to go after children from anyone but the right.No one is going after those people, your playing victim because you are not getting your way on something they should not get their way on. What is the fucking desire to go after innocent children so much!
That is literally what gender is. The cultural and social understandings. Or should we invent a third word to refer to these? If so what value is there in having two words that refer to the biology and one word which refers to the sociocultural? Would it not make more sense to have one referring to the sociocultural and the other referring to the biological? It is common practice when performing cross cultural studies to refer to cultural understandings of what it means to be a man or woman across societies as being gender and the biological as being sex.I don’t see it as part of gender. No, culture changed, style changed on what boys and girls like.
That is literally what gender is. The cultural and social understandings.
Or should we invent a third word to refer to these?
If so what value is there in having two words that refer to the biology and one word which refers to the sociocultural?
Would it not make more sense to have one referring to the sociocultural and the other referring to the biological?
It is common practice when performing cross cultural studies to refer to cultural understandings of what it means to be a man or woman across societies as being gender and the biological as being sex.
There isn't a desire to go after children from anyone but the right.
You mean it’s frustrating because it’s getting back to more parents as they find out. It’s why every school district in Florida including democrat areas is now ran by conservatives. Parents are sick of it.Pumping this rhetoric was old hat at the start and it remains so now.
Just don't drive anywhere, that would be bad.
There isn't a desire to go after children from anyone but the right.
Pumping this rhetoric was old hat at the start and it remains so now.
Every one of these hospitals should be shutdown and every person involved should be locked up.
Who has asked you to do that? I prefer to be called as who I am, but you could call me Batman for all I care, it only reflects your ignorance, not my own.So, I have a question. If it's just about having yourself be respected for your decision to change who you are, which has always been the case, why does it seem that there's always something more being asked? Why do I have to refer to you by your pronouns? I don't care what you identify as. You are a person and if you wanted to be an alien with three boobs, great! But I'm not going to go out of my way to call you alien or xenomorph, you are whatever I perceive you to be and the constitution protects my ability to do so.
Who has asked you to do that? I prefer to be called as who I am, but you could call me Batman for all I care, it only reflects your ignorance, not my own.
Quite a bit.
Yes, for some women it's important to be seen as who they are. I know people like to deliberately misgender to insult and get under the skin of trans women, and some of those women react accordingly. Most of us are numb to it, because our own brains tell us, day in and day out, that we'll always be freaks, monsters, imposters, etc. But if that's not enough, we get the people on the right screaming it at us constantly as if we're blissfully unaware of the fact that we can't biologically change our sex chromosomes from a Y to an X. That's not the end goal. The end goal is trying to make the pain stop, to finally feel comfortable in our own skin and live as close to an authentic life as we possibly can. To the right that's laughable and worthy of derision, but that's only indicative of their ignorance, their lack of common decency.