What's New
Off Topix: Embrace the Unexpected in Every Discussion

Off Topix is a well established general discussion forum that originally opened to the public way back in 2009! We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

We Muslims ain't terrorists.

There are Muslims, especially in the West, who have no idea what they are in for when Sharia is set up here.

And, yes, I said "when", not "if".

Oh, and just as a point of interest. If there are still Americans who want to ban God from public schools when that time comes, they'll get over it.

Article 10:
The State shall aspire to promote family bonds and Arab-Islamic values. It shall take care of all individuals and provide the right conditions for the growth of their talents and skills.
...
Article 13:
The aim of education is to implant the Islamic Creed in the hearts of all youths, to help them acquire knowledge and skills, to qualify them to become useful members of their society, to love their homeland and take pride in its history.
http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/country-information/laws/The_Basic_Law_Of_Governance.aspx
 
Oh, by the way


April 4, 2014

Some Muslim parents are concerned about public schools in Dearborn handing out flyers to all students advertising an Easter egg hunt, saying it violates the principle of church and state separation.

A flyer headlined “Eggstravaganza!” was given to students this week at three elementary schools in the Dearborn Public Schools district, which has a substantial number of Muslim students. The flyer described an April 12 event at Cherry Hill Presbyterian Church in Dearborn featuring an egg hunt, relay race, and egg toss. It asked students to RSVP “to secure your free spot” and included images of eggs and a bunny.

“It really bothered my two kids,” said parent Majed Moughni, who is Muslim and has two children, ages 7 and 9, in Dearborn elementary schools. “My son was like, ‘Dad, I really don’t feel comfortable getting these flyers, telling me to go to church. I thought churches are not supposed to mix with schools.’ ”

Moughni said he’s concerned about “using school teachers paid by public funds ... to pass out these flyers that are being distributed by a church. I think that’s a serious violation of separation of church and state.”

http://www.freep.com/article/20140404/NEWS05/304040016/Muslim-parents-upset-over-flier-promoting-Easter-egg-hunt-at-church


I repeat: Some Western Muslims DO NOT UNDERSTAND their own Law.
 
An then something like this comes to light.


14 April 2014

An investigation into an alleged hard-line Islamist takeover plot of Birmingham schools has widened, with 25 schools now under the spotlight.

Birmingham City Council said it had received more than 200 reports in relation to its inquiry.

It has appointed former head teacher Ian Kershaw as its chief advisor.

Anonymous claims hard-line Muslims were trying to take over the running of some city schools were made in a letter sent to local authorities last year.

The 25 schools now being looked at include primaries, secondaries and academies.

Besides the announcement about Ian Kershaw, who'll oversee the Trojan Horse investigation on behalf of the city council, there have been two other important appointments.

Stephen Rimmer will chair a second group which will include faith groups and figures from the local communities affected by the allegations.

He was brought to the West Midlands last year to lead an investigation into the abuse and sexual exploitation of children, but was previously employed by the Home Office as director of its Prevent strategy, set up to counter radicalisation.

And the Department for Education has also announced the appointment of its first Commissioner for Schools in the West Midlands.

Pank Patel will decide which schools can become academies and will monitor performance.

There has been a lot of criticism during the Trojan Horse inquiry that governance at academies has been too opaque.

The 200-plus reports to the council include emails and calls from staff, parents and governors.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-27020970
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=D3di8Vw15XY

Thoughts on this?
 
And then the Boko Haram remind us of what it means to be an Islamic Terrorist.

19 April

The headmistress of a school in Nigeria has appealed to the government to do more to save teenage girls abducted by suspected Islamist militants on Monday.

Asabe Kwambula also called on the kidnappers - thought to be members of the Boko Haram group - to "have mercy on the students".

Officials said some 85 girls were still missing while 44 managed to escape.

...
The well-armed Boko Haram fighters have killed hundreds of civilians this year, slitting the throats of many of their victims...

Boko Haram at a glance
Official Arabic name, Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad, means "People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad"

Nicknamed Boko Haram, a phrase in the local Hausa language meaning "Western education is forbidden"

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27089323
 
Saudi Arabia has once more made the point that under their system, women HAVE no rights as a person.

...

The guardian system, known as mahram, is strictly enforced in Saudi Arabia. It requires a woman to gain permission from a male guardian for all sorts of things - including travel, work, medical procedures and marriage. In a damning report, Human Rights Watch referred to it as: "the most significant impediment to the realization of women's rights in the kingdom". ...

http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-27069274
 
an update to the earlier Boko Haram post:


25 April
Nigeria's government has vowed to do all it can to rescue some 190 girls abducted from their school last week, following a crisis meeting in Abuja.

Security chiefs, ministers, state governors and religious leaders met to discuss the growing insecurity.

One governor said the abduction was the "issue of the moment" and said the government and army were doing everything they could to rescue them.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27154427
 
Al Qaeda Chief Calls For Kidnap Of Westerners
The leader of al Qaeda has reportedly called on Muslims to kidnap Westerners, particularly Americans, so they can be exchanged for militants being held in jails.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, who was previously the extremist movement's number two until the death of Osama bin Laden, said he hoped it would enable the freeing of an Egyptian convicted of attacking New York landmarks.

"I ask Allah the Glorious to help us set free Dr Omar Abdel-Rahman and the rest of the captive Muslims," Zawahiri said, according to the SITE website monitoring service.

"And I ask Allah to help us capture from among the Americans and the Westerners to enable us to exchange them for our captives."

Abdel-Rahman, known as The Blind Sheikh, is serving a life term in the US after being convicted in 1995 of conspiring to attack several New York City landmarks, including the United Nations.

Among the offences he was convicted of was seditious conspiracy in the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center.

Zawahiri's interview was posted online. Reuters said it could not verify the authenticity of the Zawahiri tape, but that the voice resembled that of the al Qaeda leader.

Egyptian-born Zawahiri went on to express solidarity with the Muslim Brotherhood which is facing a violent crackdown by the army-backed government in his home country.

Read more
 
+all hearing ear said:
And the FBI was involved in the 1993 WTC bombings... Your point again?

You will be hard pressed to find someone who hates, despises and does not trust this federal government more then me. But that idea just makes me SIGH!
 
+all hearing ear said:
And the FBI was involved in the 1993 WTC bombings... Your point again?
I will anxiously await proof/facts to backup your false statement. Thanks in advance.
 
Most of these are coming from the wide world of WTC-9/11 Conspiracy Theories and are totally unsubstantiated.

It won't be long that we'll be reading a cheerful account of how Carl Rove and W planted the bombs themselves.

After all, it couldn't have been masterminded by somebody from 'over yonder' and bankrolled by a millionaire Saudi turned terrorist who in the end was a coward.
 
But of course Karl Rove was kept in secret Nazi frozen animation and awakened when he was needed to take out the towers. As a side note I am no fan of Carl Rove.



130219_rove_teapartyemail_274.jpg
 
+all hearing ear said:
And the FBI was involved in the 1993 WTC bombings.

I see you've changed the subject to Pearl Harbor now. However, I'm still waiting for you to produce proof/facts on your above quoted statement.
 
The fallacy of their argument is that it is totally based on the assumption that Al Qaida could not have organized and carried out the mission.

Not only were they capable of it then, they are also capable of similar exercises now.

The statements about how "steel doesn't melt in a jet fuel fire" are simply wrong. Steel does not have to melt to be weakened to the point of failure.

That a dedicated group can operate in secret can be proven by simply pointing at the Masons, at the Mafia, at a union E-board.

And so on.

Now as to whether or not the CIA or the FBI or the North Shore Animal Foundation had any idea what was in the works and when it would happen, I can't answer that. It is "possible", but then, so is finding a politician with some sense of personal integrity and honor in the US House.
 
There have been conspiracies going all the way back to Lincoln.

Some are credible, and there is evidence of them. Others, not.

And at what point in this or any other discussion have I said anything about how I immediately believe what the government says? You appear to be rather quick with the name calling, which leads one to believe there is some basic flaws in your argument.

Back to the 9/11 attack, you had two foreign organizations (The Taliban government of Afghanistan, and Al Qaida) taking claim for the attack and both admitting the other helped them with it.

In the case of the original bombing, you had a known terrorist bragging about pulling it off.

Neither of which needs US government confirmation.

And as you are going to educate me about the subject, maybe you can find the quote that says something about "the best conspiracies are the ones that are never suspected."
 
There are plenty of sensible reasons why tower 7 came down. It sure was not some plot by our government. I mean come on our dirty corrupt government and far from stupid sure could come up with a better and simpler plot then this one to gain more control over the people. A dirty bomb or small nuke sure would be more effective on hiding evidence and a lot more effective for putting fear into the people to agree to just about anything on taking away there freedoms for "safety".


Update:

Structure Magazine explains one probable cause of the WTC 7 collapse. "Single Point of Failure: How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7"

http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf

Conspiracy theorists say World Trade Center 7 is the best proof for controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by airliners and only had a few fires. They also claim that there was a confession from the building owner who said he "pulled" it. But this is deceptive because while building 7 wasn't hit by an airliner, it was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7. Below is evidence showing that conspiracy theorists are wrong.

As you can see from the graphic below, all the buildings just as far away from both towers as WTC7 were hit. The others were either very short buildings which didn't have to support a massive load above or had no fire. Only Building 7 had unfought fires and the massive load of 40 stories above them.

Update:

The second paragraph above has been challenged by conspiracy theorists. For more information on this and a rebuttal read the update around the middle of the page.

Below is a photo of the Bankers Trust building.

As you can see, the building never caught fire so it was never in any danger of collapse. It also was constructed differently, with a web column design. The interior columns were not pushed out to the perimeter.

Note the WTC columns laid out as if there were a path to the building. There are no concrete slabs attached to columns. This is yet another example of pancaking. With the floors pancaking straight down, the perimeter walls were free to lean over in tall sections before breaking off and coming down. That's what gave them distance.
READ THE REST HERE
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
 
DrLeftover said:
The true believers of any conspiracy never let mere facts get in the way of a perfectly good theory.

Besides, the US Federal Government is so good at keeping secrets.

Yes, Mr. Snowden, do you have anything to add?


That was my thought. This government can't keep secrets when they are big ever. It's just a silly conspiracy that so many would have to be involved in with thousands of variables.
 
Back
Top Bottom